Feeds:
Articoli
Commenti

La relatrice speciale delle Nazioni Unite sulla violenza contro le donne, le sue cause e conseguenze, Rashida Manjoo, ha concluso la propria missione in Italia. Ecco un estratto dal suo comunicato ufficiale:

[...] My visit focused broadly on violence against women in four spheres, including the home, the community, violence perpetrated or condoned by the state, and violence in the transnational context. Issues that I looked into include domestic violence; femicide; violence against women who face multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination, including Roma, Sinti and other migrant women; detained women, women with disabilities and transgendered people. Unfortunately, violence against women continues to be a problem in Italy, similar to many other countries in the world. With statistics ranging between 70 and 87%, depending on the source,  domestic violence is the most pervasive form of violence that continues to affect women across the country. The continuum of violence in the home is reflected in the increasing numbers of victims of  femicide. Reported statistics indicate that in 2006, 101 women were killed by a partner, spouse or  former partner and this figure increased to 127 in 2010. Most manifestations of violence are  underreported in a context of a family-oriented and patriarchal society; domestic violence is not  always perceived as a crime; economic dependency; and perceptions that the state response to such  complaints will not be appropriate or helpful. Furthermore, a fragmented legal framework and inadequate investigation, punishment and compensation for women victims of violence, also contributes to the silencing and invisibility surrounding this issue.

It is important to note that the statistics mentioned above do not necessarily take into consideration the prevalence of violence against women from the Roma, Sinti and other minority communities. As minorities, such groups face multiple forms of violence and discrimination in both the private and public sectors.[...]

I commend the Government’s efforts to address the issue of violence against women, including  through the promulgation of laws such as the one on stalking; the establishment of national plans of action on violence against women and also on women, peace and security; a National Plan for the  Inclusion of Women in the Labor Market, as well as the establishment and merger of government  bodies responsible for the promotion and protection of women’s rights. However, I note that there still exist many challenges, including the full and effective participation of women in the public and  private labor sector as well as in the political sphere. A fragmented legal and policy framework, as well as limited financial resources to address violence against women, are a challenge, as regards the  effective fulfilment of Italy’s international obligations. In this regard, I would like to reiterate  the need for holistic solutions which address both the individual needs of women; and also the social, economic and cultural barriers that are a reality in the lives of all women. Such needs must also be coupled with social transformation to address the systemic and structural causes of inequality and discrimination, which most often lead to violence against women.

Finally, let me stress that the current political and economic situation faced by Italy cannot be used to justify the decrease of attention and resources to address all manifestations of violence against all women and girls in this country. I call on relevant stakeholders to take on the responsibility at this crucial time to promote human rights for all, and most importantly, to keep the issue of violence against women on the national agenda.[...]

My comprehensive findings will be discussed in the report I will present to the United Nations  Human Rights Council in June 2012.

On the 23rd of February 2012 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in the case of Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy (application no. 27765/09). The case concerned Somalian and Eritrean migrants travelling from Libya who had been intercepted on the high seas by Italian authorities and sent back to Libya, in accordance with Italian “pushback policy”.
According to the Court, the events giving rise to the alleged violations had fallen within Italy’s jurisdiction within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention.
The Court also concluded that, by transferring the applicants to Libya, Italian authorities had exposed them to the risk of ill-treatment prohibited by the Convention, therefore violating Article 3.
Moreover, it  concluded that  the removal of the applicants, carried out without any examination of each individual situation, amounted to a collective expulsion in violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4.
Furthermore, the applicants had been unable to lodge complaints under relevant provisions of the Convention with a competent authority, to obtain a thorough and rigorous assessment of their requests, before the removal measure was enforced, which amounted to a violation of Article 13 taken in conjunction with Article 3 and Article 4 of Protocol No. 4.
Finally, under Article 41 (just satisfaction), the Court held that Italy was to pay each applicant 15,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR 1,575.74 to the applicants jointly in respect of costs and expenses.
Read the full judgment

La Scuola di Studi Internazionali e il Centro per la Formazione alla Solidarietà Internazionale organizzano un Convegno su “Conflitto, Pace, Costruzione dello Stato e Istituzioni locali”presso la sala conferenza della Facoltà di Economia dell’Università degli Studi di Trento nei giorni 1-2 marzo 2012. Per maggiori informazioni clicca qui

La Organizaton of American States (OAS) cerca uno Human Rights Specialist e un Legal Officer

 

 

 

La International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies cerca un legal Intern per il proprio programma su “International Disaster Response Laws, Rules and Principles (IDRL)” (vedi il link  Legal Intern – International Disaster Response Laws, Rules and Principles | ReliefWeb).

L’Università degli Studi di Trento organizza per il 20 maggio 2011 una giornata di incontri sulle carriere internazionali: vai al sito UNITN | International Career Day 2011.

Forum Biodiritto 2011

Il 26-27 Maggio si terrà a Trento il Forum BioDiritto 2011. Il Fotum si aprirà il 26 maggio con una tavola rotonda su  “Neurogenetica e giustizia”, in cui interverranno B. Bottalico, C. Casonato, D. Ovadia, A. Quattrone, A. Santosuosso, J.V. Schwarzbach. Il 27 maggio si terrà il Convegno “Genetica, diritto e diritti”, in cui interverranno A. Alì, J. Beqiraj, R. Belfiore, A. Bonfanti, M. Borzaga, F. Casasole, C. Casonato, G. Di Paolo, E. Caliceti, A. Fodella, L. Mingardo, D. Ovadia, C. Piciocchi, P. Sommaggio, A. Trojsi, P. Veronesi. Per il programma dettagliato si veda il sito istituzionale del Forum

Il Prof. Giuseppe Nesi, consigliere giuridico dela Presidenza dell’Assemblea Generale delle Nazioni Unite, ha tenuto ieri una lezione su “Nazioni Unite e rispetto dei diritti umani nella lotta al terrorismo”.

I materiali della lezione:

- Giuseppe Nesi, “Nazioni Unite e rispetto dei diritti umani nella lotta al terrorismo internazionale alla luce del rapporto del relatore speciale dell’ONU”, in La Comunità internazionale, vol. LXVI n. 1, 2011.

Risoluzioni del Consiglio di Sicurezza citate:

Res. 1267 (1999) on the situation in Afghanistan

Res. 1368 (2001) Threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts

Res. 1373 (2001) Threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts

Res. 1904 (2009) Threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts

Res. 1963 (2010)  Threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts

Pagina dello Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism

L’art. 630 del codice di procedura penale è costituzionalmente illegittimo nella parte in cui non prevede un caso di revisione della sentenza se necessario ai sensi dell’art. 46 della CEDU. « d i r i t t o U E . i n f o.

L’intervento del Consiglio di Sicurezza in Libia richiede un’attenta riflessione. Ecco degli spunti offerti da autorevoli internazionalisti. Philippe Sands, Professore di Diritto internazionale presso lo University College London, sul Guardian, difende l’intervento (“UN’s Libya resolution 1973 is better late than never“). Richard Falk, Professore di Diritto internazionale e Relazioni internazionali della Princeton University, è più critico (“Qaddafi, Moral Interventionism, Libya, and the Arab Revolutionary Moment“).

Natalino Ronzitti, ordinario di Diritto Internazionale dell’Università Luiss “Guido Carli” di Roma, su Affari Internazionali risponde a una domanda cruciale in questo contesto (“Che fare del trattato con la Libia“) e riflette su alcuni sviluppi dell’intervento in Libia (“Ė lecito armare i ribelli libici?“).

Leggi il press release ufficiale UN rights experts sound alarm on wave of enforced disappearances in Libya.

La Grande Camera della Corte Europea dei Diritti Umani ha emesso oggi la sentenza sul caso dell’uccisione di Carlo Giuliani, da parte delle forze di polizia italiane, durante il G8 di Genova del luglio 2001. La Grande Camera ha stabilito, a maggiornaza, che nel caso di specie non vi è stata violazione dell’art. 2 della Convenzione europea (che sancisce il diritto alla vita), nè dal punto di vista sostanziale, nè da quello procedurale. Leggi il testo integrale della sentenza Gaggio and Giuliani v Italy

Articoli precedenti »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.